Friday 11 January 2013

The Verdun Project : “The Road to Verdun” by Ian Ousby (2001)


The Road to Verdun: France, Nationalism and the First World War” focuses more on why French and German armies fought at Verdun, and why the battle continued so relentlessly for so long, rather than how it was fought. The book deepens the reader’s understanding of the social and political situation in France before the Great War, and characterises the determination of the French army to hold on at Verdun as being closely associated with the pain felt in France through the humiliations of the Franco-Prussian War. It’s a beautifully written book and the late Mr Ousby has a style which is perceptive and at times entrancing. But it’s also a book which is far from straightforward and in which the arguments deployed can be complex and sometimes unwieldy. 




The Road to Verdun” is divided into three parts. The first part, “Friction at Verdun, February 1916” was probably the most use to me as a wargamer. The initial German assault of February 1916, the iconic fighting in the Bois des Caures and the fall of Fort Douaumont are thoughtfully covered. There is very little detail on the military tactics employed, at least nothing which isn’t well known from other more operationally-focused books. There are, however, a plenty of details about the intensity of the fighting, with the perspective being mainly that of soldiers and junior officers. This is history from the Poilu’s viewpoint. The emerging themes are skilfully set out: devastation, endurance and sacrifice. The sections I enjoyed most in this part were the references Mr Ousby made to the importance of ground and earth (as sacred ground) at Verdun and his insights into the religious symbolism used by French propagandists relating to the battle. These were very insightful, but sadly short, passages.

The second part, “The Endless Crisis, 1870 – 1914” is the most thematic section of the book. It is very difficult to reduce Mr Ousby’s detailed and thoughtful arguments to a single summary sentence. His arguments weave through sociology, politics, nationalism, racism, Aryanism, anthropology and religion. Its heavyweight material. Some of the arguments, especially those in the chapter entitled “What is a Nation”, are theoretical and, to my mind, perhaps even convoluted. There are times when the focus of the book, the battle of Verdun, appear to be diminishing into discussions of precisely what is France. It’s entrancing, fascinating and, for the most part, readable. But this section it is not easy going. Temptations emerge about page 160 to turn to another book, the television or paintbrushes. 

Assuming you stick with it, the main thesis emerging is that France was, in the late 19th century, not just a nation but a collection of ideas and principles and symbolized in the minds of the leading French thinkers of the time as a person: “a living being with a head and a heart, a temperament and a character. As such it could be at odds with itself without ceasing to be one” (page 148). For this symbolic person, the loss of Alsace and Lorraine in 1871 was not just the loss of land and people, but a wound – la plaie saignante, the wound that always bleeds. The author’s argument is that the dislocation, pain and shock of that loss formed a context to the determination of the French army not to yield at Verdun. 


The third part of the book, and the shortest, is “The Mill on the Meuse, March – December 1916”. This section brings us back to Verdun, but remains far from a study of how the battle was fought. There is no detailed description of tactics, or logistics. What Mr Ousby does set out are a number of vivid, and utterly horrifying, eye-witness accounts of the battle. The psychological shock of the battle is addressed. “What Verdun did to men was a masonic rite, fierce and exclusive” he states, in one memorable sentence (page 205). The quotations Mr Ousby gives from French soldiers present at Verdun – of the battle being a furnace, a slaughterhouse, a holocaust – are as moving as they are dramatic. The sheer determination and resilience of the French army to hang on to Verdun is well covered, focusing on Verdun as as symbol of, and for, France.  

The sections in which comparisons are drawn between Verdun, and Fort Douaumont in particular, and the occupied provinces of Alsace and Lorraine in the Franco-Prussian War are well judged. “Sullen lump of concrete and metal and earth though it might be, Douaumont was spoken of as if it were a living thing: a hostage, a captive taken by the enemy and suffering at their hands. Above all, Douaumont was a woman: a beautiful French woman, another Daughter of France, abused and defiled” (p. 213). 


In short, I very much enjoyed the book, despite it being a difficult and sometimes frustrating read. I’d recommend it to anyone wanting to know more about France in the late 19th Century, and about why the French army fought at Verdun so hard and for so long. As military history, while there are some very good passages, there are also many sections which (in the light of French scholarship since 2001) look slightly outdated – although the same can be said of other books I want to review on Verdun in the coming months. As a historical thesis, I think the book is compelling but without being, ultimately, completely persuasive. 

While it’s difficult to give a book like this a rating, I’d give it 4 out of 5 star-shells as a history text, but probably 3 out of 4 star-shells if you’re looking for an operational-level study of the battle.

15 comments:

  1. Great review, Sidney. I loved this book for evoking the feeling of France in the early Twentieth Century.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Nate. I'm really glad I'm in good company in enjoying Mr Ousby's book.

      Delete
  2. Sidney, thanks for this very thoroughtful review.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting stuff, haven't read that yet, may have to check it out myself. Looking forward to the research into the Mutinies that follows the re-opening of the archives in 2017, not that I think it will change much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Kieran! There are some interesting looking books about the French mutinies, but I've not checked any of them out yet. Hopefully the centenary will see quite a lot of historians looking again at different aspects of the Great War with fresh eyes, and not just treading over old ground. Thanks again for dropping by and commenting!

      Delete
  4. Thanks Sid, a very insightful review. Doubt I will buy it but the local library have a copy so I may take it out sometime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a good read, Phil - but I know exactly where you are with the library hire for a book like this. I'd probably have done the same had it been in my library!

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Curt, you will really enjoy it. It's right up your street, Sir!

      Delete
  6. A comprehensive review Sidney and that third picture paints a thousand words.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Pat. That's the Ouvrage de Thiaumont, one of the destroyed French observation posts at the heart of the battle. The cupola was 10" thick and weighed 7 tons before being blown apart by German heavy artillery. As you rightly say...a thousand words....

      Delete
  7. Thanks for the comprehensive and insightful review Sid. I'll be checking this one out after i've got through my christmas readings. I'm actually toying with focusing my honours thesis on French national identity formation in the Third Republic, so it sounds like it might be worth a look. Have you had a chance to read Alistair Horne's Price of Glory yet? His 1871-1916-1940 trilogy is what got me interested in modern French history.
    Ben

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ben, thanks so much for the comment! If you're looking at French national identity in the Third Republic, then Ian Ousby's book would be a very good one to consult. Most of the second section of the book deals with French nationalism, identity and political symbolism. There's also a good bibliography (sorry, I should have mentioned that before).

    Alistair Horne's "The Price of Glory" is the third book I'll review here (after Malcolm Brown's "Verdun 1916"), following which I'll be reviewing Robert Doughty's "Pyrrhic Victory: French Strategy and Operations in the Great War". There's some others which I'll review if I can get round to them, but probably not before February.

    Hope that helps!

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://bunkermeister.blogspot.com/

    Great blog, I love the painting jobs you do! I have added your blog to my blog list, would you do the same for me?

    Thanks.
    Mike Bunkermeister Creek

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...